MFI Is Trying To Provide Bipartisan Support And Applied Science By Providing Sustainable Cost Effective Solutions For Our Builders That Fight Against Climate Change

Blog 1

MFI Is Trying To Provide Bipartisan Support And Applied Science By Providing Sustainable Cost Effective Solutions For Our Builders That Fight Against Climate Change

April 1, 2019 by Steve Conboy

The trees we grow in reforestation programs produce the lumber we use to meet our growing housing demands has a huge carbon value when buildings are fire treated.

Our present dependence on fossil fuels means that, as our demand for energy inevitably increases, so do emissions of greenhouse gases, most notably carbon dioxide (CO2). To avoid the obvious consequences on climate change, the concentration of such greenhouse gases in the atmosphere must be stabilized. But, as populations grow and economies develop, future demands now ensure that energy will be one of the defining issues of this century. This unique set of (coupled) challenges also means that science and engineering have a unique opportunity-and a burgeoning challenge-to apply their understanding to provide sustainable energy solutions. Integrated carbon capture and subsequent sequestration is generally advanced as the most promising option to tackle greenhouse gases in the short to medium term. Here, we provide a brief overview of an alternative mid- to long-term option, namely, the capture and conversion of CO2, to produce sustainable, synthetic hydrocarbon or carbonaceous fuels, most notably for transportation purposes.

Basically, the approach centres on the concept of the large-scale re-use of CO2 released by human activity to produce synthetic fuels, and how this challenging approach could assume an important role in tackling the issue of global CO2 emissions. We highlight three possible strategies involving CO2 conversion by physico-chemical approaches: sustainable (or renewable) synthetic methanol, syngas production derived from flue gases from coal-, gas- or oil-fired electric power stations, and photochemical production of synthetic fuels. The use of CO2 to synthesize commodity chemicals is covered elsewhere (Arakawa et al. 2001 Chem. Rev. 101, 953-996); this review is focused on the possibilities for the conversion of CO2 to fuels. Although these three prototypical areas differ in their ultimate applications, the underpinning thermodynamic considerations centre on the conversion-and hence the utilization-of CO2. Here, we hope to illustrate that advances in the science and engineering of materials are critical for these new energy technologies, and specific examples are given for all three examples. With sufficient advances, and institutional and political support, such scientific and technological innovations could help to regulate/stabilize the CO2 levels in the atmosphere and thereby extend the use of fossil-fuel-derived feedstocks.

Fact: CO2 sequestration in growing trees is (=) a natural form of “bio-sequestration” of CO2 gas...

Fact: the wood framed and mass timber building industry can make the scientific claim that our national forest are a great source and natural facility for supporting the biosequestration of CO2 (greenhouse gas)

Also, with advantage- the industry can claim that by practicing the new best practice of fire-protecting 100% of lumber in wood frame and mass timber buildings, builders are also protecting and preserving the carbon mass naturally stored in the building’s lumber, produced when trees (from which the lumber was produced) grew siliently in the forests... while CO2 gases were naturally bio-sequestered abd used during photosynthesis reactions within the leaves of the trees, to extract carbon and produce clean O2 for living creatures on earth to breathe.

This is Applied Science...

The unprecedented climate change influenced by elevated concentrations of CO2 has compelled the research world to focus on CO2 sequestration. Although existing natural and anthropogenic CO2 sinks have proven valuable, their ability to further assimilate CO2 is now questioned. Thus, we highlight here the importance of biological sequestration methods as alternate and viable routes for mitigating climate change while simultaneously synthesizing value-added products that could sustainably fuel the circular bioeconomy. Four conceptual models for CO2 biosequestration and the synthesis of biobased products, as well as an integrated CO2 biorefinery model, are proposed. Optimizing and implementing this biorefinery model might overcome the limitations of existing sequestration methods and could help realign the carbon balance.

If All Builders would Fire treat all the interior lumber in wood framed building we would have a significant positive impact on climate change.

Copyrights 2019 @ M Fire Suppression Inc.